Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dianne Latter's avatar

Interesting thoughts. I have family members with tattoos and have accepted that they are pleased with their choices. Personally I would not get one, just because I just don't like them. Years ago I met a young lady, covered with tattoos, my first reaction was, "she must be a biker" or in a gang. Neither was true, she was a delightful normal everyday person. For whatever reason she thought covering herself with ink was flattering. I disagree. While I've come to "like" the looks of tattoos, I don't understand why people get multiples that you can't even figure out what the picture is. In closing it seems years ago we thought inks were a sign of "evil" people now are proving that thought wrong.

Joseph Cole's avatar

This topic is surprisingly more relevant in traditional communities than it used to be, I think. Conservative Catholics in particular seem to sway between thinking a tattoo is "based" or utterly pagan. When I was at college, a lot of pretty traditional students who visited the holy land got a cross tattoo in the way of the crusaders (originally intended to identify your slain body as the remains of a Christian in case you were mutilated). And then there are figures ranging from Fr. Mike Schmitz to Matt Walsh who seem to approve the practice with the same kinds of reservations you have.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?